Yes
No
Sort of
| Local Man Claims Responsibility For Own Problems | |||||
| |||||
| Local Man Claims Responsibility For Own Problems | |||||
| |||||
Without newspapers I would have no memories of sitting on my grandmother’s lap learning how to read. I wouldn’t have had one of the most interesting careers on the planet nor a way of finding out what’s really going on in the world.
I have spent all of my adult life in the business, so it would be dishonest of me to say that I wasn’t heartened to read President Obama’s words about journalism and that he would consider bailing out newspapers.
But the side of me with “bailout fatigue” has to wonder if saving newspapers is the best use of taxpayers’ money.
Declining readership, dwindling advertising dollars and the growing popularity of Web sites and cable news shows have all put enormous financial pressures on newspapers, which threatens the industry’s survival — and some newspapers have already gone under .
With more and more Americans turning to YouTube or “The Daily Show” for news these days, bailing out newspapers probably isn’t one of the soundest investments to make right now.
In praising newspaper journalism, Obama added: “I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding.” The president’s worries underscore the findings in a Pew Research Center survey released this month that shows public assessment about the accuracy and independence of news stories is now at its lowest level in more than two decades. Just days after Obama made his comments about a bailout, Congress held a hearing on the future of newspapers. The hearing, coincidentally, came on the very same day the parent company of the publication you’re reading right now laid off 44 workers. “ . . . the government can help foster solutions for this industry in ways which protect the independence of newspapers and enables their objective reporting to thrive in a new economic and media climate,” said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney , D-N.Y., who chaired the Sept. 24 hearing. Maloney has also introduced legislation she says will enable local newspapers to take advantage of nonprofit status as a way to preserve their place in communities nationwide. If attendance at the hearing is an indication for how much appetite members of Congress have for saving newspapers, then the industry just might be doomed. Only three of the 20 House and Senate members showed up for it, and the Democratic chairman left early to vote on a House bill, putting the ranking Republican in charge, The Washington Times reported. Since the days of Alexander Hamilton, the Founding Fathers insisted on a free press. “[It] would be quite as significant to declare that government ought to be free, that taxes ought not to be excessive, etc., as that the liberty of the press ought not to be restrained,” Hamilton wrote in The Federalist Papers, No. 84.
| Rating: | ★★★★★ |
| Category: | Other |
"Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America . Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these:
First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.
Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ' 60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individ uals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.
We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??
Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks. Let him go to Altoona ? And Johnstown , and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for 'deserving ' white kids.? Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America ? Is it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?
Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?
As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?
Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?
We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena . And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.