Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Rep. Alan Grayson Aplogizes: TO THE DEAD!




Rep. Alan Grayson: "I apologize to the dead and their families"

The hypocrites on the right were demanding that Rep. Grayson apologize for his remarks characterized as on a par with Rep. Wilson's rednecked "YOU LIE! [boy]" outburst.

1) Wilson wasn't just stupid, he was WRONG. Obama wasn't lying, as anyone with a measure of reading skills can attest for his/ herself.

2) Grayson was telling a TRUTH: over FORTY THOUSAND PEOPLE DIE EVERY YEAR in the richest country in the world simply because they cannot afford healthcare.

3) The repugs HAVE NO COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE REFORM. They've had DECADES to do something about it and have done....

NADA.

In any case, Grayson was gracious enough to apologize... watch for yourself. LOL!

Minors Getting Tried As Adults

Should minors who commit felonies be tried as ADULTS?

Yes
 
 5

No
 
 3

Should minors who commit felonies be tried as adultsWhy or why not?

On the Take: How much were Senators paid for yesterday's health care vote?

On average, Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee who voted FOR a public option to be included in the health care overhaul took home $3 million given to them by insurance companies and other health care industry lobbyists.

Those handful of Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee who voted AGAINST the public option took home more than $10 million.

Now, we're just talking about those members on the committee. Money given to the entire Senate and House of Representatives isn't included in this amount.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus alone got about $1.8 million in campaign contributions from health care lobbyists, according to a report released by The Sunlight Foundation. The foundation is a nonpartisan organization that seeks to make the workings of government more transparent.

You can use the report below to compare how much money members of the Senate Finance Committee got from unions, which favor a public option, versus the amount of money they received from insurance companies and other industry lobbyists.

Just in case you wanted to know what members are on the take - and how much money was stuffed into their pockets - see the chart below. Using campaign finance disclosure forms that members of Congress are required by law to submit, the Sunlight Foundation compiled this report. The info is straight from the horses' mouths, so to speak.

Go ahead, take a look for yourself, and make up your own mind.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name Party Labor Contributions (2005-2010) Health Contributions (2005-2010) Ratio (Health:Labor) Rockefeller Amendment Schumer Amendment
Mike Crapo R $2,000 $243,226 121.6:1 N N
Jon Kyl R $13,000 $1,188,238 91.4:1 N N
Chuck Grassley R $11,500 $651,627 56.7:1 N N
Jim Bunning R $2,500 $112,650 45.1:1 N N
John Cornyn R $27,250 $1,226,469 44.6:1 N N
John Ensign R $12,000 $521,575 43.5:1 N N
Orrin Hatch R $31,100 $1,020,334 32.8:1 N N
Pat Roberts R $12,000 $343,849 28.7:1 N N
Blanche Lincoln D $36,100 $641,004 17.8:1 N N
Mike Enzi R $26,500 $423,749 16.0:1 N N
Maria Cantwell D $22,500 $353,342 15.7:1 Y Y
Ron Wyden D $39,000 $370,175 9.5:1 Y Y
Max Baucus D $207,925 $1,763,799 8.5:1 N N
Olympia Snowe R $103,750 $367,549 3.5:1 N N
Kent Conrad D $253,750 $652,178 2.6:1 N N
Debbie Stabenow D $284,125 $737,243 2.6:1 Y Y
Bill Nelson D $241,890 $613,594 2.5:1 N Y
Jay Rockefeller D $240,800 $605,400 2.5:1 Y Y
Chuck Schumer D $140,500 $298,650 2.1:1 Y Y
John Kerry D $103,248 $188,558 1.8:1 Y Y
Jeff Bingaman D $229,500 $366,414 1.6:1 Y Y
Tom Carper D $180,010 $287,406 1.6:1 N Y
Robert Menendez D $400,100 $603,343 1.5:1 Y Y


** Both Senators Chuck Schumer and Jay Rockefeller each introduced public option plans. Both were voted down by the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.

Palin's Lectures a Tough Sale

Sarah Palin's forthcoming book may be soaring up the bestseller lists, but the New York Post reports her success on the speaking circuit -- she's asking $100,000 a speech -- is limited so far.

Says an industry expert: "The big lecture buyers in the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they think she is a blithering idiot."

Capitalism vs.Statism

This article was originally published in Outside Looking In: Critiques of American Policies and Institutions, Left and Right. New York: Harper and Row, 1972, pp. 60-74. Reprinted in The Logic of Action Two: Applications and Criticism from the Austrian School. Glos, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1997, pp. 185-199.]

From the very first we run into grave problems with the term "capitalism." When we realize that the word was coined by capitalism's most famous enemy, Karl Marx, it is not surprising that a neutral or a pro-"capitalist" analyst might find the term lacking in precision. For capitalism tends to be a catchall, a portmanteau concept that Marxists apply to virtually every society on the face of the globe, with the exception of a few possible "feudalist" countries and the Communist nations (although, of course, the Chinese consider Yugoslavia and Russia "capitalist," while many Trotskyites would include China as well). Marxists, for example, consider India as a "capitalist" country, but India, hagridden by a vast and monstrous network of restrictions, castes, state regulations, and monopoly privileges is about as far from free-market capitalism as can be imagined.[1]

If we are to keep the term "capitalism" at all, then, we must distinguish between "free-market capitalism" on the one hand, and "state capitalism" on the other. The two are as different as day and night in their nature and consequences. Free-market capitalism is a network of free and voluntary exchanges in which producers work, produce, and exchange their products for the products of others through prices voluntarily arrived at. State capitalism consists of one or more groups making use of the coercive apparatus of the government — the State — to accumulate capital for themselves by expropriating the production of others by force and violence.

Throughout history, states have existed as instruments for organized predation and exploitation. It doesn't much matter which group of people happen to gain control of the State at any given time, whether it be oriental despots, kings, landlords, privileged merchants, army officers, or Communist parties. The result is everywhere and always the coercive mulcting of the mass of the producers — in most centuries, of course, largely the peasantry — by a ruling class of dominant rulers and their hired professional bureaucracy. Generally, the State has its inception in naked banditry and conquest, after which the conquerors settle down among the subject population to exact permanent and continuing tribute in the form of "taxation" and to parcel out the land of the peasants in huge tracts to the conquering warlords, who then proceed to extract "rent." A modern paradigm is the Spanish conquest of Latin America, when the military conquest of the native Indian peasantry led to the parceling out of Indian lands to the Spanish families, and the settling down of the Spaniards as a permanent ruling class over the native peasantry.

"In a profound sense, the free market is the method and society 'natural' to man; it can and does therefore arise 'naturally' without an elaborate intellectual system to explain and defend it."

To make their rule permanent, the State rulers need to induce their subject masses to acquiesce in at least the legitimacy of their rule. For this purpose the State has always taken a corps of intellectuals to spin apologia for the wisdom and the necessity of the existing system. The apologia differ over the centuries; sometimes it is the priestcraft using mystery and ritual to tell the subjects that the king is divine and must be obeyed; sometimes it is Keynesian liberals using their own form of mystery to tell the public that government spending, however seemingly unproductive, helps everyone by raising the GNP and energizing the Keynesian "multiplier." But everywhere the purpose is the same — to justify the existing system of rule and exploitation to the subject population; and everywhere the means are the same — the State rulers sharing their rule and a portion of their booty with their intellectuals. In the nineteenth century the intellectuals, the "monarchical socialists" of the University of Berlin, proudly declared that their chief task was to serve as "the intellectual bodyguard of the House of Hohenzollern." This has always been the function of the court intellectuals, past and present — to serve as the intellectual bodyguard of their particular ruling class.

con't

excerpted

In fact, it is instructive to make a list of the universally acknowledged problem areas of our economy and our society, and we will find running through that list a common glaring leitmotif: government. In all the high problem areas, government operation or control has been especially conspicuous.

Let us consider:

  • Foreign policy and war: Exclusively governmental.
  • Conscription: Exclusively governmental.
  • Crime in the streets: The police and the judges are a monopoly of government, and so are the streets.
  • Welfare system: The problem is in government welfare; there is no special problem in the private welfare agencies.
  • Water pollution: Municipally owned garbage is dumped in government owned rivers and oceans.
  • Postal service: The failings are in the government owned Post Office, not, for example, among such highly successful private competitors as bus-delivered packages and the Independent Postal System of America, for third-class mail.
  • The military-industrial complex: Rests entirely on government contracts.
  • Railroads: Subsidized and regulated heavily by government for a century.
  • Telephone: A government-privileged monopoly.
  • Gas and electric: A government-privileged monopoly.
  • Housing: Bedeviled by rent controls, property taxes, zoning laws, and urban renewal programs (all government).
  • Excess highways: All built and owned by government.
  • Union restrictions and strikes: The result of government privilege, notably in the Wagner Act of 1935.
  • High taxation: Exclusively governmental.
  • The schools: Almost all governmental, or if not directly so, heavily government subsidized and regulated.
  • Wiretapping and invasion of civil liberties: Almost all done by government.
  • Money and inflation: The money and banking system is totally under the control and manipulation of government.

Examine the problem areas, and everywhere, like a red thread, there lies the overweening stain of government. In contrast, consider the frisbee industry. Frisbees are produced, sold, and purchased without headaches, without upheavals, without mass breakdowns or protests. As a relatively free industry, the peaceful and productive frisbee business is a model of what the American economy once was and can be again — if it is freed of the repressive shackles of big government.

http://mises.org/story/3735

Michael Moore to Dems: Get on board or 'we will work against you'

Do you share Michael Moore's Frustration with those Democrats who do not support the Public Option?

Sort Of
 
 0

Yes
 
 4

No
 
 1

Controversial liberal filmmaker Michael Moore on Tuesday issued a warning to Democrats who have been cool to President Barack Obama’s call for meaningful health care reform: Get on board or prepare to lose your seat.

“To the Democrats in Congress who don’t quite get it: I want to offer a personal pledge. I – and a lot of other people – have every intention of removing you from Congress in the next election if you stand in the way of health care legislation that the people want,” Moore told supporters of women’s groups and unions gathered at the headquarters of the government watchdog group Public Citizen. “That is not a hollow or idle threat. We will come to your district and we will work against you, first in the primary and, if we have to, in the general election.”

Democrats have started to take for granted the support of women, unions and low-income workers, according to Moore, who is promoting “Capitalism: A Love Story,” a documentary about the financial collapse due for wide release Friday.
“You think that we’re just going to go along with you because you’re Democrats? You should think again,” he told the Tuesday crowd in a speech that was carried to members of the media dialed into a conference call. “Because we’ll find Republicans who are smart enough to realize that the majority of Americans want universal healthcare. That’s right. That’s absolutely right. Don’t take this for granted.”

Moore issued a not-so-veiled warning to Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and an opponent of the so-called public option, though not by name, asserting that his movie could be a rallying point for people across the country – including in Montana – to work to defeat Democrats who opposed the public option.

“You’ve made a serious mistake,” he warned Baucus.

Moore also called out Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), who supports the public option, but whose role in financial regulation as chairman of the Senate banking committee comes in for criticism in “Capitalism.” Speaking to Public Citizen, Moore said, “we’re going to lose this seat unless we run another Democrat” and said he’d “already received a phone call from a well known Democrat to tell me to back off Sen. Dodd.”

LINK

Public Says Voice Not Heard on Health Care

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3
A new poll by NPR, the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Harvard school of Public Health says while lawmakers bicker and deal, the public feels largely shut out. Despite public support, the Senate Finance Committee voted down the public option Tuesday.

Lesson Plans: What Makes A Teacher Qualified?

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113223026
Everyone from President Obama on down seems to agree: a good teacher can make a huge difference in the life of a child.

American schools have been trying for decades to improve teacher quality, with mixed results. Over the next year, NPR will explore those efforts, and look at the latest crop of teachers entering the profession.

Teaching performance is difficult to improve in part because the profession is so large. With about 4 million teachers in the profession, efforts to boost quality tend to take place on the margins. Many efforts focus on expanding the pool of new teachers entering the workforce, and on encouraging more teachers to work with special education and low-income students.

Considerable blame has been directed at the certification process. State requirements tend to steer teachers to traditional teacher colleges and require specific hours of coursework. And since all states have different requirements, teachers often find it's best to go to college in their state. This helps create a hiring market that is very localized. Many teachers end up working close to where they themselves went to elementary or high school.

Public Support For Health Overhaul Rebounds

Public Support For Health Overhaul Rebounds

September 29, 2009


By Maggie Mertens

As August heated up, opposition to a health-care overhaul hit the boiling point. But a September poll taking the public's temperature on the administration's plan to remake the health system show tempers may be cooling and that support for action is on the rise.

 
How do you feel about health overhaul? (iStockphoto.com)
The Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health research group, has surveyed a nationally representative random sampling of Americans six times since February on healthcare issues. The latest results, from polling during the week ended Sept. 18, show President Obama's luck may be turning.

One feeling that has eased for Republicans is the belief that their families would be "worse off if the president and Congress passed health care reform," Kaiser said. The September poll shows about half of Republicans feel this way, that's down from 61 percent in August. Overall, only 23 percent of respondents believe they would be worse off --down from 31 percent in August.

The biggest change in attitude since August is an 8 percentage-point increase to 53 percent of those who say "the country would be better off with reform." As for timing, 57 percent say they want action now, while 39 percent say that we cannot afford to take this on presently, those numbers have stayed fairly stable since February.

The results show that hot-button topics such as a public option, expanding Medicare, and an individual mandate are supported by solid majorities. Seventy percent of those polled favored expanding Medicare coverage to all uninsured 55 to 64-year-olds. Sixty-eight percent supported an individual mandate requiring all Americans to have insurance. And nearly 60 percent of all Americans polled supported a public option.

A litmus test for health change: 56 percent of Americans say they have put off care in the last year because they couldn't pay for it.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2009/09/public_support_for_health_over.html 

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

The New Bill Of Rights




So let me get this straight...

1. Right to a job...gotta move to Mexico for that.

2. Right to earn enough for food, clothing, and recreation...Damn gotta be a CEO to do that.

3. Farming for a decent living...well we know how that will work out.

4. A small businessman to trade without the domination of monopolies...will the corporation sit down so that the American people can stop crawling.

5. Right to a decent home...HOME we dont have a home, we have a mortgage and bills, cant take pride in something you cant spend ten minutes to enjoy. Im working to damn hard for the money.

6. Right to adequate health care...to quote Bulworth"SOCIALISM"!

7. Right to a good education...wanna know why Johnny cant read...the teacher cant read either, or is too damn afraid of Johnny's gang affiliation or his "trench coat mafia" to help the little overprotected thug.

8. Economic protection of the sick, unemployed, and the elderly...you will not see a dime from social security when you are watching your tax dollars get sent to Blackwater for private corporation's protection.

People you cant be so emotionally deficient to need a marketing strategy to make you feel good about something that is good...

If you do....

Try this... humanity...EVEN A CAVEMAN CAN DO IT!

Im done!

Flood kills 246 in Philippines; survivors seek aid - Yahoo! News

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090929/ap_on_re_as/as_philippines_flooding
One of my friends is a blogger from the Philippines and aid is desperately needed at this point. She said that money that goes through private charities works better than giving it to the government due to some sticky pockets. If you are thinking of making a contribution, be it cash or items here is how to do it:

if you are in the USA you can give it here and they will forward it to the CDRC...

BAYAN-USA

We are making this appeal for financial support as the current administration is woefully unprepared and unable to help the hundreds of thousands of our compatriots and friends. BALSA will be coordinating efforts to distribute food, medicines, clothing and other basic necessities to help the people through this crisis. Because BALSA is firmly linked with the masses, aid will directly go towards the basic sectors of society – the workers, peasants and the urban poor who make up the majority of the victims (despite media attention that “the poor and rich are equally impacted”).

Donate Online via Paypal

Or, donations can be directly deposited into the following account:

Bank: Chase
Account Name: BAYAN-USA
Account Number: 340-209749-3

Thank you for your support.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Rhonda Ramiro, Secretary General of BAYAN-USA at secgen@bayanussa.org, or Jeff Rice, Finance Officer of BAYAN-USA at finance@bayanusa.org.

Various Drop-off centers

New York

NAFCON (Nat’l Alliance for Filipino Concerns)/SANDIWA Nat’l Alliance of Fil-Am Youth are now receiving relief donations (clothes, blankets, medical supplies, monetary). NY drop-off @ BAYANIHAN Filipino Community Center, 40-21 69th St. Woodside, NY 11377. Call (516)901-1832 or email sandiwa.national@gmail.com if you would like to help.

New Jersey

Drop-Off Points:
1) Sinugba Cafe – 561 Westside Ave. Jersey City, NJ 07304
2) Casa Victoria – 691 Newark Ave. Jersey City, NJ 07306-2803 You can send CASH through Metro Bank acct. 3 189 14540 1 For BAYAN’s “BALSA” (Bayanihan Alay sa Sambayanan)

For donations in New Jersey please contact:
(201)621-3156-Yves Nibungco
(917)476-7855- Nick Cordero

Los Angeles

In Los Angeles area please contact Kuu Hilo (818)395-9207. You can send CASH through Metro Bank acct. 3 189 14540 1 For BAYAN’s “BALSA” (Bayanihan Alay sa Sambayanan)

San Francisco/Bay Area

For donations in San Francisco/Bay Area, please contact Ryan Leano (626)534-4971. Monetary donations can also be dropped off at these sites. Checks can be made out to “Lakasdiwa,” a non-profit organization that will send the funds directly to MIGRANTE International in the Philippines, a workers’ organization directly helping the victims in the disaster relief efforts. Please put “Typhoon Ondoy Relief” on the check’s note.

Filipino Community Center
4681 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94112

Liwanag Kultural Center
Hillside Park Clubhouse
222 Lausanne Ave.
Daly City, CA 94014
Mondays 3:30-6:00
Tuesdays 3:30-6:00
Wednesdays 3:30-8:00
Thursdays 3:30-6:00

Asian Pacific Islander Youth Promoting Advocacy & Leadership
Attn: Armael Malinis, AnakBayan-East Bay
310 8th Street, Suite 215
Oakland, CA 94710

Stanford’s Pilipino American Student Union (PASU) is also collecting donations to be sent to the Philippines to help victims of Typhoon Ondoy (international name Ketsana). If you would like to make a donation, please contact AV David at avhdavid@stanford.edu or (650) 491-4561.

San Jose/South Bay

Filipino Youth Coalition (FYC) & Filipino Community Support (FOCUS) drop-off sites:

Welch Park Community Building
Located at corner of Kenesta Way and Clarice Dr
San Jose, CA 95122

Valley Faith United Methodist Church
1251 Sandia Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94089

Portland, Oregon

Contact Portland Committee for Human Rights in the Philippines through Claire Oliveros portlandchrp@gmail.com. You can send CASH through Metro Bank acct. 3 189 14540 1 For BAYAN’s “BALSA” (Bayanihan Alay sa Sambayanan).

Please contact Consuelo Rivera at welorivera@yahoo.com or call at (503)7299449.

New Jersey Requiring Mandatory Flu Swine Shots For Their Children!

Appeals Court Sides With CBS, Dismissing Dan Rather's Claims - WSJ.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090929-711571.html
By Nat Worden
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--A state appeals court dismissed Dan Rather's lawsuit against his former bosses at CBS Corp. (CBS) on Tuesday, dealing a possible knockout blow to the news anchor's high-profile dispute over the circumstances of his departure from the network.

Rather, 77, alleged that CBS ruined his reputation, making him a scapegoat for a flawed 2004 story on then-President Bush's Vietnam-era Texas Air National Guard service. The story aired during that year's presidential election.

In an unanimous decision, the appellate court ruled that Rather's claim "must be dismissed in its entirety."

The New York court said Rather's claim that his career was damaged because of fraud and breach of contract by CBS was "unavailing," noting the newsman admits the network was already contemplating he would step down to a reduced role in 2006.

"As to lost opportunities in the trade," the court ruled that Rather "never identified a single opportunity with specified terms that was actually available to him and which he declined to accept because of CBS' actions."

CBS spokesman Jeff Ballabon said, "This lawsuit is now effectively over" and it was a "total victory - and vindication for CBS' position."

Rather's lead attorney, Martin Gold, said in a statement that "we are extremely disappointed" with the court's decision. He added that "the decision is incorrect on a number of grounds and, accordingly, we intend to ask the New York Court of Appeals to review it."

Rather, who joined CBS News in 1962, has also claimed CBS conducted a biased investigation instead of the independent probe it promised into the underlying story and its production.

Rather left the network in June 2006, after CBS was spun off by Viacom (VIA). He now works for HDNet.

-By Nat Worden, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-2472; nat.worden@dowjones.com

With Obama as President, Media Not Interested in Casket Coverage

With Obama as President, Media Not Interested in Casket Coverage




During the Bush administration, journalists and liberal politicians were up in arms against a Defense Department policy that forbade the photographing of caskets coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan. Now that we have a Democrat as a commander in chief, however, the caskets are old news, and are getting little to no coverage.

Critics of the Bush Administration's policy of refusing to allow the photographing of caskets returning from the battlefield claimed that the Pentagon was attempting to hide the true cost of war from the American public to maintain support for the war efforts.

A lawsuit in April 2005 forced the release of hundreds of such photos. University of Delaware professor Ralph Begleiter, who brought the suit against the administration, citing the Freedom of Information Act, said of his victory that it was "an important victory for the American people, for the families of troops killed in the line of duty during wartime and for the honor of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country."

He added that the decision would "make it difficult, if not impossible, for any U.S. government in the future to hide the human cost of war from the American people."

As Byron York notes in today's Washington Examiner,

In April of this year, the Obama administration lifted the press ban, which had been in place since the Persian Gulf War in 1991. Media outlets rushed to cover the first arrival of a fallen U.S. serviceman, and many photographers came back for the second arrival, and then the third.

But after that, the impassioned advocates of showing the true human cost of war grew tired of the story. Fewer and fewer photographers showed up. "It's really fallen off," says Lt. Joe Winter, spokesman for the Air Force Mortuary Affairs Operations Center at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, where all war dead are received. "The flurry of interest has subsided."

On Sept. 2, when the casket bearing the body of Marine Lance Cpl. David Hall, of Elyria, Ohio, arrived at Dover, there was just one news outlet -- the Associated Press -- there to record it. The situation was pretty much the same when caskets arrived on Sept. 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 22, 23 and 26. There has been no television coverage at all in September.

The journalists that rushed to show the country what two wars really can cost, and the pols that ceaselessly defended them, are silent now the country has an agreeable (liberal) president. That Obama allows the photographing of caskets seems to have taken all of the spice out of it. Coverage at Dover Air Force Base was seemingly more about Bush's policy of forbidding coverage of the return of fallen warriors than it was about the warriors themselves, as so many claimed.

York again:

So far this month, 38 American troops have been killed in Afghanistan. For all of 2009, the number is 220 -- more than any other single year and more than died in 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 combined.

With casualties mounting, the debate over U.S. policy in Afghanistan is sharp and heated. The number of arrivals at Dover is increasing. But the journalists who once clamored to show the true human cost of war are nowhere to be found.

IS THIS WHAT YOU'RE TEACHING YOUR CHILD?




Students Chant "Assassinate Obama" on School Bus

Issa Ramps Up Probe of Mortgage Company Phone Taps

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=1&docID=cqmidday-000003211930&mp=Most_Viewed
The revelation that Countrywide Financial recorded phone conversations as part of a specialized “VIP” mortgage loan program has added another twist to a Republican-led inquiry on Capitol Hill.

Republican Rep. Darrell Issa , who has aggressively pursued the now-defunct Countrywide program for much of this year, said Monday that a call-recording system put in place as early as 2003 could contain evidence of wrongdoing by prominent public officials.

He requested a raft of new information about the program and the taping system from Bank of America, which purchased Countrywide in July 2008 as it struggled with mounting losses amid the collapse of the housing market.

The Wall Street Journal reported the existence of the taping, and that the recordings had been destroyed, on Sunday night.

The program became a lightning rod for controversy when it was revealed that two prominent senators, Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad , D-N.D., and Banking Chairman Christopher J. Dodd , D-Conn., received loans through the program.

House Passes Bill To Avert Medicare Premium Increase

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=cqmidday-000003209910&mp=Most_Viewed
The House passed a bill that would prevent Medicare premiums from rising sharply for about 11 million senior citizens.

The legislation would block a big increase in Medicare Part B premiums for the affected seniors, who account for about 27 percent of those enrolled in the health insurance program for the elderly and disabled.

They are in jeopardy of a steep increase in their monthly premiums because of complexities in federal law and the likelihood that Social Security recipients won’t get a bump in their benefits next year to cover the cost of the premium increase.

“I have 100,000 Social Security recipients in my congressional district [who] will be impacted by the increase in the Medicare Part B premiums next year since this increase is not going to be offset by the normal cost-of- living increase in their Social Security checks,” said Rep. Shelley Berkley , D-Nev. “I think this is a very important way and a very necessary way of helping to keep my seniors who rely on Social Security ... whole.”

More Americans Paying Attention

Gallup: "Thirty-six percent of Americans say they follow news about national politics 'very closely.' That is the highest level seen in any year without a presidential election since 2001. Republicans are the biggest consumers of political news, but attention has grown this decade among all three party groups."

Going Rogue

Sarah Palin has finished her memoir just four months after the book deal was announced, the AP reports. The book will be called Going Rogue: An American Life.

The release date has been moved up from the spring to Nov. 17 with a huge first printing of 1.5 million copies.

Rich Senator, Poor Senator

A Roll Call analysis of U.S. Senate financial disclosure forms shows 48 senators are not in the millionaire's club, but nonetheless nearly all reported minimum net worths above the typical American household. The remaining 50 Senators record minimum net worths of at least $1 million or more.

The survey included 98 Senators. Disclosure forms from newly appointed Sens. George LeMieux (R-FL) and Paul Kirk (D-MA) are not yet publicly available.

Wealth in the chamber ranges from Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) -- the richest Member of Congress overall -- who tops the list with a minimum net worth of at least $167.55 million, to Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), who registers a negative $40,000."

Monday, September 28, 2009

Uninsured 22-Year-Old Boehner Constituent Dies From Swine Flu


http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/25/swineflu-boehner-constituent/
[Last link of the night, I swear. This one I had to include... ]

Think Progress:

A 22-year-old woman from Oxford, Ohio, died from swine flu on Wednesday. Kimberly Young graduated from Miami University in December and continued to live in Oxford, Ohio, within Minority Leader John Boehner’s congressional distrct. Reports now indicate that after initially getting sick, Young put off treatment because she was uninsured:

Young became ill about two weeks ago, but didn’t seek care initially because she didn’t have health insurance and was worried about the cost, according to Brent Mowery, her friend and former roommate. […]

On Tuesday, Sept. 22, Young’s condition suddenly worsened and her roommate drove her to McCullough Hyde Memorial Hospital in Oxford, where she was flown in critical condition to University Hospital in Cincinnati.

“That’s the most tragic part about it. If she had insurance, she would have gone to the doctor,” Mowery said...

****

RIP Kimberly Young and may your death not be in vain...

"No one should die because they cannot afford health care... "

Glenn Beck Refuses (Can't?) to Define "White Culture"




Yeah, my "race card" playing Puerto Rican ass can't let a day go with playing the race card (plus almost ALL my blogs are longer than your second knuckle).

1) He can't define a construct ("white culture") HE asserted Obama hates. I'll let the twats explain THAT...

2) He then plays "victim." Yeah, that fuckin Katie playing "gotcha" journalism again. Next, she'll ask some necon twat what paper they read...

If it were any credible journalist, Glenn Beck would've been eaten alive. As it is, Couric backpedaled and allowed this clown to turn the tables. Still, the clip is priceless in that it shows a RACIST caught dead to right!

LOL

Activism: Center for The Working Poor

http://www.centerfortheworkingpoor.org/
Another good site for progressive news, actions, and resources.

Remember that a huge segment of thr working class are either uninsured or underinsured. This isn't just a "poverty" "Black" "Latino/a" "socialist" thing. It's a HUMAN issue.

Activism - Healthcare-NOW!

http://www.healthcare-now.org/about/
There are many ways we can engage the poltical process. the internet offers various effective ways to get your message across. Yes, for some of us a mouse click, an email, a phonecall is what we can do and it's a lot more than we think.

This link serves as a grassroots movement and also a resource for those interested in applying their efforts in conjunction with other like-minded individuals.

It ALL counts.

Mobilization for Health Care for All | Down with Death Panels!

http://www.mobilizeforhealthcare.org/
On September 29th in New York City, October 8th in Chicago, and in cities across the country on October 15th, over 100 people who have signed this pledge will put our bodies on the line to challenge the real death panels.

We will enter the offices of the major insurance companies and demand that they cover the care they are denying to their members. We won't leave until they do. The companies will have to decide - admit they're wrong and approve the care, or have us arrested and show the world how far they will go to protect their obscene profits. If we're arrested, some of us will even refuse to give our names and be released until the insurance companies meet our demand.

We hope that our actions will save the lives of some of the people who are being denied critical care by these death panels today. But we know we can save the lives of millions in the years to come by putting a spotlight on just why our system is broken and how urgently we need fundamental change. We will go to jail to demand that the insurance companies stop denying care to their members immediately, but our sacrifice will be a call to our entire nation to stand up to these death panels and demand real reform - Medicare for All - that finally ensures that every one of us gets the health care we need.

All I know is they better have my money!!!!

Social Security Will Pay Out More Than it Takes In

WASHINGTON — Big job losses and a spike in early retirement claims from laid-off seniors will force Social Security to pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes the next two years, the first time that's happened since the 1980s.

The deficits — $10 billion in 2010 and $9 billion in 2011 — won't affect payments to retirees because Social Security has accumulated surpluses from previous years totaling $2.5 trillion. But they will add to the federal deficit.

Applications for retirement benefits are 23 percent higher than last year, while disability claims have risen by about 20 percent. Social Security officials had expected applications to increase from the growing number of baby boomers reaching retirement, but they didn't expect the increase to be so large.

What happened? The recession hit and many older workers suddenly found themselves laid off with no place to turn but Social Security.

"A lot of people who in better times would have continued working are opting to retire," said Alan Auerbach, an economics and law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. "If they were younger, we would call them unemployed."

Job losses are forcing more retirements even though an increasing number of older people want to keep working. Many can't afford to retire, especially after the collapse demolished their nest eggs.

Some have no choice.

Marylyn Kish turns 62 in December, making her eligible for early benefits. She wants to put off applying for Social Security until she is at least 67 because the longer you wait, the larger your monthly check.

But she first needs a job.

Kish lives in Concord Township in Lake County, Ohio, northeast of Cleveland. The region has been hit hard by the recession.

She was laid off about a year ago as an office manager at an employment agency and now spends hours each morning scouring job sites on the Internet. Neither she nor her husband, Raymond, has health insurance.

"I want to work. I have a brain and I want to use it."

Kish is far from alone. The share of U.S. residents in their 60s either working or looking for work has climbed steadily since the mid-1990s, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This year, more than 55 percent of people age 60 to 64 are still in the labor force, compared with about 46 percent a decade ago.

Kish said her husband already gets early benefits. She will have to apply, too, if she doesn't soon find a job.

"We won't starve," she said. "But I want more than that. I want to be able to do more than just pay my bills."

Nearly 2.2 million people applied for Social Security retirement benefits from start of the budget year in October through July, compared with just under 1.8 million in the same period last year.

The increase in early retirements is hurting Social Security's short-term finances, already strained from the loss of 6.9 million U.S. jobs. Social Security is funded through payroll taxes, which are down because of so many lost jobs.

The Congressional Budget Office is projecting that Social Security will pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes next year and in 2011, a first since the early 1980s, when Congress last overhauled Social Security.

Social Security is projected to start generating surpluses again in 2012 before permanently returning to deficits in 2016 unless Congress acts again to shore up the program. Without a new fix, the $2.5 trillion in Social Security's trust funds will be exhausted in 2037. Those funds have actually been spent over the years on other government programs. They are now represented by government bonds, or IOUs, that will have to be repaid as Social Security draws down its trust fund.

President Obama has said he would like to tackle Social Security next year.

"The thing to keep in mind is that it's unlikely we are going to pull out (of the recession) with a strong recovery," said Kent Smetters, an associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "These deficits may last longer than a year or two."

About 43 million retirees and their dependents receive Social Security benefits. An additional 9.5 million receive disability benefits. The average monthly benefit for retirees is $1,100 while the average disability benefit is about $920.

The recession is also fueling applications for disability benefits, said Stephen C. Goss, the Social Security Administration's chief actuary.

http://www.kansas.com/news/story/989321.html

Report: NJ property taxes hit the poor hardest

ASBURY PARK, N.J. - People with lower incomes tend to pay a higher percentage of New Jersey's highest-in-the-nation property taxes, according to a study by Gannett New Jersey.

The study is contained in an eight-part series, "Fighting New Jersey's Tax Crush," which began Sunday.

New Jersey has the fifth-highest median income in the country, but property tax rates vary widely in the state's 566 municipalities. The disparities arise from the fact that New Jersey relies heavily on property taxes to pay for local government.

Because cities and older suburbs have more lower-income and elderly residents who need more government services, and because those communities have lost more of their tax base as wealthier homeowners have left for newer suburbs, lower-income residents often are stuck with the bill.

The Gannett study found a family earning $40,000 would pay 14 percent of its income to property taxes, while a family earning $126,000 would pay seven percent.

"Spending needs are often greatest where resources are least," Henry A. Coleman, a professor at Rutgers University's Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, told Gannett.

Because income and race are closely linked, Gannett found that the more minorities in a municipality, the greater the likelihood that property taxes will take a bigger chunk of income.

The gap between rich and poor is most evident in northern New Jersey. A 2005 study by the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan found that the New York-northeastern New Jersey area is the most economically segregated of the country's 25 largest metropolitan centers.

New Jerseyans also don't fare well compared to the rest of the nation in the amount they spend on non-mortgage housing expenses, which include utilities and maintenance as well as taxes.

According to the U.S. Census, residents of Passaic and Hudson counties in northern New Jersey who own their homes and don't pay a mortgage spend 21 cents of every dollar they earn on housing costs , the highest rate of the nation's 1,882 counties. Ocean County is fifth at 20 cents per dollar.

http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/state/new_jersey/20090927_ap_reportnjpropertytaxeshitthepoorhardest.html

California Reports on Excessive Regulation

The Cost of California

A report was recently released by the State of California detailing the cost of regulation to the state's economy. The results are damning.

Regulation costs just under half a trillion dollars annually. It costs the state four million jobs. It costs the state twelve billion in taxes.

The cost to the state's economy is equal to what is currently one third of the state's GDP. The twelve billion in taxes would close the existing budget gap without resorting to fancy accounting. The four million jobs would put the state's unemployment rate below, instead of above, the national average.

This report was actually commissioned by the State of California. It was due in 2007, and it was submitted in 2007, but the governor, showing the well-known small-government leanings that are commonly associated with the Republican Party, sat on it fro two years until forced to release it.

It is truly a damning report, especially given that it was released by an agency of the state government. Those who see the government as the solution to various problems are faced with the government saying that the government is the cause of problems.

Because the autors are professors of the social sciences at state universities, that gives them all the qualifications a statist would ever need - had this been done privately the criticism would be that because it is done privately there is an agenda that discredits the report. Because the report is printed in the Small Business Administration of the State of California, that gives the report all the credibility a statist would ever need - had this been printed privately the criticism would be that because it is done privately there is an agenda that discredits the report.

The Report

CONCLUSIONS

This study measures and reports the cost of regulation to small business in the State of California. It employs an original and unique approach using a general equilibrium framework to identify and measure the cost of regulation as measured by the loss of economic output to the State’s gross product, after controlling for variables known to influence output. It also measures second order costs resulting from regulatory activity by studying the total impact – direct, indirect, and induced. The study finds that the total cost of regulation to the State of California is $492.994 billion which is almost five times the State’s general fund budget, and almost a third of the State’s gross
product. The total cost of regulation results in an employment loss of 3.8 million jobs which is a tenth of the State’s population. Since small business constitute 99.2% of all employer businesses in California, and all of non-employer business, the regulatory cost is borne almost completely by small business. The general equilibrium framework yields the following results:

• The direct cost of the regulatory environment in California is $176.966 billion in lost gross state output each year. The direct cost does not account for second order costs.

• The total loss of gross state output for California each year due to direct, indirect, and induced impact of the regulatory cost is $492.994 billion.

• In terms of employment this total output loss is equivalent to the loss of 3.8 million jobs for the state each year. A loss of 3.8 million jobs represents 10% of the total population of California. In terms of labor income, the total loss to the state from the regulatory cost is $210.471 billion. Finally the indirect business taxes that would have been generated due to the output lost arising from the regulatory cost is $16.024 billion.

• The total regulatory cost of $492.994 billion is four to four and a half times the total budget for the state of California, and almost five to six times the general fund alone. Further, given the total gross state output of $1.6 trillion for California in 2007, the lost output from regulatory costs is almost a third of the gross state output.

• The indirect business taxes lost could have helped fund many of the state’s departmental budgets. As an example, the indirect business taxes lost are 60 times the budget of the Office of Emergency Services, and would have paid for almost half the budget of the Department of Education.

• The total cost of regulation was $134,122.48 per small business in California in 2007, labor income not created or lost was $57,260.15 per small business, indirect business taxes not generated or lost were $4,359.55 per small business, and finally roughly one job lost per small business.

• The total regulatory cost of $492.994 billion translates into a total cost per household of $38,446.76 per household, or $13,052.05 per resident. The total cost per household comes close to the median household income for California.

This study provides the most comprehensive and complete analysis of the total regulatory burden in California. The study and findings have implications for policymakers and those in charge of the regulatory environment. The results also suggest that future research should attempt to understand how to minimize the intended and unintended costs of regulation. Since small businesses are the lifeblood of California’s economy constituting 99.2% of all employer businesses, efforts to make the regulatory environment more attractive will make California a more attractive state for doing business. This in turn will improve the state’s output, employment, labor income, indirect business taxes, economic climate, quality of life, living standards, and growth prospects.
 

Obama Facebook Poll Asking "Should Obama Be Killed?" Pulled From Site (PHOTOS)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/28/obama-facebook-poll-asks_n_301860.html

Teabaggers Exposed: Meet The Anti-Obama Group! (These People Have No Idea What They Are Protesting Against)





Go to about the 1:30 min mark, you can see they have no idea what they are talking about...LOL

The End Of Marriage As We Know It Is The Beginning Of SoulMates

http://josephalmighty.multiply.com/links/item/401
Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing (or understanding) the scriptures, nor the power of God (to give you eternal life). For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. But as touching the resurrection of the (spiritually) dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine (because they could barely understand what he was talking about, but some believed anyway). Matthew 22:29-33 (KJV)

And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage (as you know it): Luke 20:34-35 (KJV)

"Dearest Ones, one of the greatest gifts of the Fifth Dimension will be the joyous and loving relationships that you will create and enjoy as awakened beings. When you awaken to your power and open your hearts, then you will create the most beautiful and loving soulmate relationships. You will not settle for anything less than a soulmate union."

The End Of Marriage As We Know It Is The Beginning Of SoulMates
http://josephalmighty.multiply.com/links/item/401

Christ Has Returned To the Earth In the Flesh,
As The Lightning Of His WORD Flashes
From East In China To The West !!!

An opportunity to rein in government spying & reform the Patriot Act

Dear Friend of Freedom:

As Congress begins to consider renewing sections of the USA PATRIOT Act that are set to expire at the end of the year, we have a unique opportunity to press for new civil liberties protections to shield ordinary Americans against government spying.

Last week, ten US Senators introduced the perfect vehicle for reform of the surveillance powers in the PATRIOT Act, as well as the much broader and more dangerous FISA Amendments Act (FAA), the warrantless surveillance law that was passed by Congress last summer.

The new bill, called the JUSTICE Act, would add essential new checks and balances to a broad range of surveillance powers. In particular, it would reform the notorious National Security Letter power that allows the FBI, without court supervision, to secretly demand that companies hand over your private phone and Internet records.

Even more important, the JUSTICE Act would add strong new privacy protections to the FAA, which vastly expanded the government's authority to sweep up Americans' phone calls and emails without probable cause or meaningful court review.

The JUSTICE Act would also repeal the immunity for telecommunications companies that illegally assisted in the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program. This would restore the rule of law and allow EFF's suit against AT&T to continue so that the courts can do their job and rule on the legality of the surveillance.

This is our first real shot at meaningful surveillance reform in a long time, but things are moving very quickly. The Senate Judiciary Committee is planning to consider PATRIOT renewal this week. It's crucial that the bill that the committee sends to the Senate floor contains as many of the JUSTICE Act's reforms as possible.

It's time to fix PATRIOT once and for all, and now is our chance. Please contact your senators today and ask them to co-sponsor and support the JUSTICE Act.

Wolf Blitzer asks David Axelrod some Tough Questions

http://www.cdobs.com/archive/featured/a-first-wolf-blitzer-ask-david-axelrod-some-tough-questions,64456

Ed Morrissey

BLITZER: Why not break down the state barriers and let all of these insurance companies compete nationally without having to simply focus in on a state by state basis?

AXELROD: Because we are trying to do this in a way that advances the — the interests of consumers without creating such disruption that it makes it difficult to to move forward.

BLITZER: Why would that be disruptive? If Blue Cross and Blue Shield or United Health Care or all of these big insurance companies, they don’t have to worry about just working in a state, they could just have the opportunity to compete in all 50 states?

AXELROD: But insurance is regulated at the — at this time, Wolf…

BLITZER: But you could change that. The president could propose…

AXELROD: …state by state.

BLITZER: The president could propose a law…

Obama to go to Copenhagen to Hawk Chicago Olympic Bid

Dear Friends,

President Obama has decided to go help Chicago bid for the Olympics.

Link: http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/09/obama_copenhagenbound_for_ioc.html?track=email-alert-breakingnews

What will is cost us in the end?

We are belly up here now.

Sigh.

Cat

Should Taxpayers Bailout Newspapers?

Without newspapers I would have no memories of sitting on my grandmother’s lap learning how to read. I wouldn’t have had one of the most interesting careers on the planet nor a way of finding out what’s really going on in the world.

I have spent all of my adult life in the business, so it would be dishonest of me to say that I wasn’t heartened to read President Obama’s words about journalism and that he would consider bailing out newspapers.

But the side of me with “bailout fatigue” has to wonder if saving newspapers is the best use of taxpayers’ money.

Declining readership, dwindling advertising dollars and the growing popularity of Web sites and cable news shows have all put enormous financial pressures on newspapers, which threatens the industry’s survival — and some newspapers have already gone under .

With more and more Americans turning to YouTube or “The Daily Show” for news these days, bailing out newspapers probably isn’t one of the soundest investments to make right now.

In praising newspaper journalism, Obama added: “I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding.”

The president’s worries underscore the findings in a Pew Research Center survey released this month that shows public assessment about the accuracy and independence of news stories is now at its lowest level in more than two decades.

Just days after Obama made his comments about a bailout, Congress held a hearing on the future of newspapers.

The hearing, coincidentally, came on the very same day the parent company of the publication you’re reading right now laid off 44 workers.

“ . . .  the government can help foster solutions for this industry in ways which protect the independence of newspapers and enables their objective reporting to thrive in a new economic and media climate,” said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney , D-N.Y., who chaired the Sept. 24 hearing. Maloney has also introduced legislation she says will enable local newspapers to take advantage of nonprofit status as a way to preserve their place in communities nationwide.

If attendance at the hearing is an indication for how much appetite members of Congress have for saving newspapers, then the industry just might be doomed. Only three of the 20 House and Senate members showed up for it, and the Democratic chairman left early to vote on a House bill, putting the ranking Republican in charge, The Washington Times reported.

Since the days of Alexander Hamilton, the Founding Fathers insisted on a free press.

“[It] would be quite as significant to declare that government ought to be free, that taxes ought not to be excessive, etc., as that the liberty of the press ought not to be restrained,” Hamilton wrote in The Federalist Papers, No. 84.

Click to keep reading.




Sunday, September 27, 2009

New ways of talking about familiar ideas

Today, I attended the first of an 8-week series of a workshop on sexual orientation and gender identity at my new church (new because I'm new to the area--and I really must learn to call it a fellowship and not a church). It's actually part of the UU Welcoming Congregation process, but in this case, it was being done as an Interfaith effort and was actually run by a woman from another church. While most of the people there were UUs, there were people from other denominations, too, including a minister.

I learned a couple new terms that I think are worth mentioning, not because being up on the latest PC terminology is important, but because each has important implications.

The first is affectional orientation as an alternative to sexual orientation. This is important because it speaks to the truth that orientation is not about sex and is not limited to sex. People who are straight get that they're straight all the time and that being straight isn't about having sex or engaging in various sex acts or wanting to do so. It is about who you love and who you are as much as it is about whom you sleep with. More, in fact. So affectional orientation serves as a reminder that being gay is not about "having gay sex"; that engaging in sex acts with a person of the same gender doesn't make you gay; ad that engaging in sex acts with a person of the other gender doesn't make you straight.

The second is cisgender. Turns out, I'm a cisgender woman. This is a term that is, to some degree, opposed to transgender. A cisgender person is a person who identifies as her or his birth gender. A cisgender man is a man who was born a man and who identifies as a man, and a cisgender woman is one who was born a woman and identifies as a woman.

Why not just say "normal," you may be asking? That is precisely the point, at least for me. The idea of having and using a term for what most people tend to think of as normal and to prescribe as normative is wonderful. It helps us avoid lumping the world into "normal" things that don't need names and "abnormal" things that do. If everything is named, then there is no "gold standard" for what people are "supposed" to be; at least, not one implied in the nomenclature. But if words for people who don't fit the majority pattern are used and everyone else is just vaguely thought of as "normal," there is definitely an implied value judgment.

I'm not saying that these new-to-me terms will change the world or insisting that everyone use them in a PC way. I do believe that they reflect the changing nature of the way in which we view reality, and that they have the potential to help move that change along.

And the sooner that change is complete, the better the world will be. Because homo-, bi-. and transphobia are bad for absolutely everyone, not just their obvious victims. But that's a topic for another entry.

A Note to Political Soul Members

Rating:★★★★★
Category:Other
I want to first thank those who accepted invites to join Political Soul and others who requested to join.

I think we have a pretty good group of members. I initially wanted to cap membership at 100, but that crept up a bit to 130. Still a decent size with ample discussion. Now I'm considering upping the cap again, in order to ensure quality discussions. I just don't want it to get too big too quickly.

I want this forum to be a place where we can all intelligently discuss politics and policy, both domestic and International as well as economic and other issues. That doesn't mean we all have to share the same perspective, ideology or understanding. It does mean that we have to appreciate where the other member is coming from, even if we disagree with them.

For the most part dialogue, at least for me, has been a tremendous learning experience. The dialogue, thus far, has also been without a lot of rancor or profanity. I'd like to keep it that way. We are all adults and shouldn't have to abide by a lot of childish rules, nor should we have to be monitored like school children. As adults we know how we want to be treated and should govern ourselves accordingly.

Like I said, so far so good. This is just a reminder that there are no "rules" here per se, other than having respect for ourselves and for one another. If you have complaints or suggestions on how we can work to improve discussions around here, please let me know below (or privately).

That's all I have to say for now. Everyone have a wonderful week, and I look forward to reading your posts.

Thanks again for being such great contacts!

Best,

Tracie

Paterson Running in 2010















New York Governor David Paterson has joined the apparently increasing ranks of people who disagree with Barack Obama, announcing that he plans to run for re-election in 2010, despite the president’s alleged advice not to run. In an interview with Meet the Press, Paterson said that, contrary to reports, Obama never directly told him to drop out and “can’t say” what exactly the president’s thoughts are on the issue. Paterson has been criticized consistently over the past several months, beginning with his treatment of Caroline Kennedy’s short-lived Senate candidacy. Paterson acknowledged the onslaught of recent problems, saying, “I’m blind, but I’m not oblivious.” Nonetheless, he seems confident that he can turn around his poll numbers before the election, and is committed to remain in the race. “You don’t give up because everybody’s telling you what the future is,” he said.

New Smart CCTV Cameras Will be Watching You

By Mike Swain

There are four million CCTV cameras in the UK but most of them are useless for fighting crime.

Cameras watch us on buses trains and at airports but their effect on reducing crime has been negligible.

That's because they simply record huge amounts of film and virtually none of it is ever viewed.

It just gets put on a disc and stored and never looked at again unless the police want to check it while investigating a crime.

But a new generation of CCTV cameras is being tested which will not only film you but assess and analyse everything you are doing.

They make an assessment of your age, gender, the colour of your clothes and other factors to assess whether you are at risk.

Changing your seat on a bus, standing on the stairs or loitering too close to the driver could trigger the computer to think you are a threat.

Pictures will be beamed back to a central control room where a computer will filter out the pictures and highlight the ones where there is the biggest crime risk.

Instead of watching a bank of screens security analysts will just need to watch three or four which the computer has highlighted for them to watch in "real time."

If the security officer thinks there is a threat they could appear on a screen in a bus or train and tell you: "We've got our eye on you."

Or the CCTV film could be relayed to the nearest police patrol car and a police officer would appear on the screen with the same message.

These smart CCTV cameras are already being tested and are set to become the latest weapons in fighting crime on public transport within the next five years.

The software for the cameras is being developed at the new £25 million Centre for Secure Information Technologies at Belfast University.

Dr Paul Miller, Research Director of Intelligent Surveillance Systems, said there had been a "lost decade" of massive investment in CCTV cameras.

"Current CCTV cameras operate in a very passive way. They simply collect enormous amounts of data but very little is watched in real time.

"The system will instantly give every live feed a score, based on factors such as time of day, crime statistics for the location, a threat assessment of the people shown and so on. The score will determine where each feed is placed in the queue for the controller's attention," said Dr Miller.

"We aim to develop a system which will make crime-free buses, trains, stations and airports a reality."

A camera at a bus stop would analyse everyone in the queue and make a judgement whether it was a risky group. Factors such as whether the stop was in a high crime area and whether it was late at night would be included.

The passengers would be assessed again on the bus with help from simple metal detectors on the doors and driver microphones picking up any shouting or disturbance

Dr Miller rejected the idea that the cameras were an invasion of privacy and said they would encourage people back onto the buses.

"It reduces the amount of surveillance because it only looks at what is appropiate. It is protecting privacy in many ways, " he said.

http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/science/2009/09/new-smart-cctv-cameras-will-be.html

Obama Wants Shorter Summer Vacation

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2009/09/27/more_school_obama_would_curtail_summer_vacation/?page=1
Students beware: The summer vacation you just enjoyed could be sharply curtailed if President Barack Obama gets his way.

Obama says American kids spend too little time in school, putting them at a disadvantage with other students around the globe.

"Now, I know longer school days and school years are not wildly popular ideas," the president said earlier this year. "Not with Malia and Sasha, not in my family, and probably not in yours. But the challenges of a new century demand more time in the classroom."

The president, who has a sixth-grader and a third-grader, wants schools to add time to classes, to stay open late and to let kids in on weekends so they have a safe place to go.

"Our school calendar is based upon the agrarian economy and not too many of our kids are working the fields today," Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a recent interview with The Associated Press.

Former Secret Service, FBI Officers: Political Violence May Be Imminent

unarmed


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently invoked the grim specter of political violence, arguing that today’s angry political climate could cause people to cross the line from heated talk to dangerous actions.

Republicans sharply rejected her claim, with House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) saying Pelosi is “living in another world.” Others charged that the California Democrat herself stoked emotions by labeling some health reform protesters “un-American.”

But it’s not just Pelosi who is worried. In interviews with POLITICO, five former Secret Service, FBI and CIA officers say that they, too, are concerned that today’s climate of supercharged political vitriol could lead to violence.

And this week, the FBI said that it is investigating whether anti-government sentiment played a role in the death of a U.S. Census worker who was found hanged from a tree in rural Kentucky, because the body had the word “fed” scrawled on the chest — though authorities say there are too many unanswered questions at this point to rule the case a homicide or a hate crime.

Beyond any specific case, some of the experts see the political moment as a part of a larger trend that’s been developing since the mid-’90s — dating back to GOP attacks on President Bill Clinton and continuing through the left’s sharp criticism of President George W. Bush, who was called a “liar” and “loser” by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

This summer’s protests against health care included an episode where freshman Rep. Frank Kratovil Jr. (D-Md.) was hanged in effigy. Anti-energy bill protesters tarred and feathered an effigy of Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.). Last Halloween, a homeowner in liberal West Hollywood hanged in effigy Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin at his home.

There’s a big difference, of course, between a person who shouts at a congressman at a town hall and a person who would do something much more violent. But security experts say that the shouting incidents and other angry moments in recent weeks serve as indicators of an increase in political rage in the culture.

That rage comes against a backdrop of enormous changes in American life. The United States suffered a humiliating economic collapse that threatens its long-term position as the world’s most important economy, with a staggering 9.7 percent unemployment rate. President Barack Obama made several controversial federal interventions into the private sector.

At the same time, the country has elected its first African-American president at a moment when dramatic demographic changes mean that the groups now considered racial minorities will account for the majority of the U.S. population by the year 2042.

That kind of sweeping social change can be deeply unsettling.

“Times of threat bring increased aggression,” said Jerrold Post, a CIA veteran who founded the agency’s Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior during his 21-year career at headquarters in Langley, Va.

“And the whole country’s under threat now, with the economic difficulties and political polarization,” said Post, now a professor of psychiatry at The George Washington University. “The need to have someone to blame is really strong in human psychology. And once you have someone to blame, especially when there’s a call to action, some see it as a time for heroic action.”

In the United States, experts say, political violence is more likely to come from deranged loners than to come from any specific political group. For every Timothy McVeigh who is motivated by a murderous political ideology, there are far more delusional figures like Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, who tried to kill President Gerald Ford in 1975, and John Hinckley Jr., who tried to kill President Ronald Reagan in 1981.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27566.html#ixzz0SMEJ1iVU

Should a woman be offended

 

 

Should a woman who has never been with a man other then her husband, dresses modestly, doesn’t use foul language or allow crude jokes in her presence., be offended if people call her a slut.

If she protests that she isn’t a slut, and gets upset by it, is that proof that she’s a slut?

 

 

Rules:

Any comment containing the word "racist" will be deleted.

Update: Commission penalizes swim club in Pennsylvania racism complaint

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/09/23/pennsylvania.swim.racism/
The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission issued a finding of probable cause Tuesday that racism was involved in the decision last June by a suburban Philadelphia swim club to revoke privileges of a largely minority day care center.

The commission ordered monetary damages for humiliation and embarrassment and a civil penalty of not more than $50,000.

The decision noted that none of the club’s 155 paid members this year was African-American.

Last year, according to the decision, there were “179 paid memberships, none of whom were African American.”

In addition, the decision noted that in 2009, the Valley Club “made a concerted effort to expand the geographic range of its membership by engaging in a marketing campaign…. The Respondent efforts were mainly directed at areas with overwhelmingly Caucasian populations…. The Respondent made no effort to direct such marketing efforts at areas with significant African American populations….”

Glenn Beck is a Neocon (Not a Libertarian)




I don't know that Glenn knows what he is...

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Who will join me?

For one week, any blog we start will come with the rule: “Any comment using the word racist will be deleted.” No exceptions for comments or posters we agree with. Use the word, the comment’s gone.

 

Rules:

Anarchy rules!

The distracting benefits of ACORN hysteria

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/09/17/acorn_hysteria/index.html
Earlier this week, I wrote about how the Fox-News/Glenn-Beck/Rush-Limbaugh leadership trains its protesting followers to focus the vast bulk of their resentment and anxieties on largely powerless and downtrodden factions, while ignoring, and even revering, the outright pillaging by virtually omnipotent corporate interests that own and control their Government (and, not coincidentally, Fox News). It's hard to imagine a more perfectly illustrative example of all of that than the hysterical furor over ACORN.

A suggestion for those who overplay the race card.

 

I understand that many people on the left like to call anyone who disagrees with obama’s agenda racists. It comes in handy when they can’t defend the policy. But it’s getting old. So I went to my thesauruses and came up with a variety of words you can use to try and discredit any opposition to obama. Even bad debating doesn’t have to be boring.

Chauvinistic

Bigoted

Xenophobic

Racialist

Racially prejudiced

I hope this has been helpful.

Jesus...Notorious D.O.C.

So let me understand, conservatives by nature are God-fearing people.

God last time I checked wanted us to be kind to each other. Jesus, as we all know, was prolific as a healer. So if you go according to the lovely marketing strategy …

W.W.J.D?

Would he say David Flores can leave the hospital after being struck by a car? Would he wait for two weeks before the back specialist would see him?

I always thought one thing, I could do a lot of things wrong, but many of them wouldn’t break my mother’s heart? Try having to bury a child.

Would he say universal health care is his father’s will?

Would he say any man regardless of his background or experiences deserves medical attention?

Would he say please don’t allow another person to die because it cost too much?

How much is a life worth to you? How much is your child, mother, father, wife, husband worth to you?

Wow people! Jesus cured the sick, brought the dead back to life, he never said…

Sorry Blue Cross Blue Shield won’t cover him. Eventually we are going to have to ask ourselves are we so consumed with our own insular world that we could care less about someone else? The question is when we are the sick person, when we are the “unlucky” will we say…HELP ME JESUS!

Jesus has not returned, but there are doctors that are healers, that can make the sick well. When are we going to love one another as Jesus wanted?

I write this for many people, but mainly for David and his family. For your loss I'm so sorry.

The Money Trail: Martinez follows other lawmakers straight to K Street

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27560.html
It used to be that lawmakers were coy about any ideas they had about heading for K Street, waiting until their terms ended before announcing they were beginning a more lucrative career.

But in recent years, members of Congress planning to become lobbyists have not been able to wait. In fact, when Florida Republican Mel Martinez this week accepted a position with the mega-lobbying and law firm DLA Piper — less than two weeks after resigning from the Senate — it brought to five the number of former lawmakers since 2007 who have abandoned their constituents midterm and almost immediately resurfaced with lobbying firms, according to data provided by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

“This used to be considered unacceptable, but it really is a growing phenomenon,” said Meredith McGehee, who lobbies for stricter lobbying and ethics regulations for the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center. “The reality is that the money has gotten so big and so tempting these days, that I think a lot of these members are saying, ‘I don’t think I’ll go back into political office, first of all, and, the money is just too big to turn down.’”

For Congressional Black Caucus, joy is tempered by worry

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27465.html
For the Congressional Black Caucus and its 42 members, these should be the best of times.

The nation’s first black president, Barack Obama, now resides in the White House.

“This is a triumphant moment,” said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), the CBC’s chairwoman. “After all, a member of the CBC was elected president.”

Yet for many CBC members, there’s also an underlying sense of nervousness and concern about the shifting political landscape in the eight months since Obama was sworn in. The sudden explosion of tea party groups, with right-wing protesters carrying signs depicting Obama as an African witch doctor or in a Nazi uniform, has infuriated some black lawmakers, who say such behavior wouldn’t be tolerated for a white president.

Student Loan Reform Is Needed Now

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-claflin21-2009sep21,0,793358.story
Here is an issue near and dear to my heart right now...
----------------------------

Students face enough of a financial challenge without lining bank executives' pockets. Congress, please take student loans from private banks and shift them to the existing government program.

The Jay Leno Show 09/24/2009 part 1 - Rush Limbaugh, Smokey Robinson




Town Halls: If Congress really cared about what you think

Town Halls: If Congress Really Cared What You Think. . .
By Jane Orient
Published 09/22/09

After the town halls are over, and congressmen head back to Washington, possibly to do whatever they had already decided based on high-level threats or promises, many citizens are asking, exactly what was the point?

Our Blue Dog Democrat congresswoman, for example, billed her town hall as a "listening session"—but for whom? People jamming the auditorium and the more than 1,000 seated outside listened for half an hour to introductory remarks by Persons of Importance. During the remaining one-and-a-half hours, she took about 15 questions. In her answers, she "recited parts of her stump speeches, extolling the virtues of Cash for Clunkers, the Stimulus, Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare," according to a physician attendee.

The audience learned a few things about her positions, in the most general terms. She said she’s opposed to single payer, for tort reform, strongly supportive of a public option, and opposed to anything "that is not actually paid for."

She and the press complained about a "boisterous," "rude" crowd, whose boos and cheers sometimes drowned out the speaker. Especially the cheers in response to the suggestion to vote the entire Congress out in 2010. Of course, the "applause meter" was the only method available for most members of the audience to express themselves.

The fact that the attendees were evidently opposed to "reform" by a margin of 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 apparently did not register with the press—which didn’t mention it. Or with the congresswoman, who thought people were mainly "frustrated with a broken system."

If Congress really wants to learn from constituents, isn’t the process backwards? Why doesn’t the representative, at some point, ask the audience for a show of hands on some basic questions? For example:

Do you favor or oppose rushing reform through without hearings or adequate time to read and debate the proposal?

Do you trust the government to run a health insurance company?

Do you think Americans should be forced to buy health insurance, and the kind of health insurance the government dictates?

Do you favor or oppose a federal health board, modeled on the Federal Reserve, to make decisions affecting the availability of medical services?

Do you favor or oppose a health plan that will increase the federal debt?

Do you favor or oppose giving the Internal Revenue Service access to your financial records to be sure you are paying the required health insurance premiums?

Of course, these are not the questions most Congressmen are likely to think of. Maybe the audience has to suggest the questions as well as ask for a poll on the answers.

The biggest question of all is why are we even discussing the details, while begging the biggest question of all: Does Congress have the Constitutional authority to do any of the things that are proposed as "health care reform"?

Where does it get the right to outlaw existing private arrangements and contracts? To force Americans into government dependency for paying for their medical care? To set medical standards and prices for medical services? To manage one-sixth of the economy? To decide for individuals what they can afford? To delegate enormous authority over people’s lives to an executive agency to avoid political accountability?

Well, of course there’s Medicare, the big, popular precedent. As Jonathan Swift pointed out in Gulliver’s Travels, if a wrong can legally be done once, precedent assures that it can be done again.

If a one-vote, one-time democracy has the right to turn American medicine over to czars like Zeke Emanuel, then town halls might as well be an orchestrated circus to give homage to our elected nonrepresentatives.

But Congress apparently did not foresee the response this August. Change is in the air. Long-held assumptions are being challenged. America might yet turn back from the road to tyranny, and find the way back to freedom and limited, Constitutional government.


Copyright © 2009 Campaign for Liberty

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=229